Some Bundesliga teams live two different attacking lives: at home they look fluid and dangerous, away they become cautious, disconnected or simply less efficient. Home/away goal tables for the 2025–26 season show that this split is not just anecdotal; several clubs combine strong home goal output with modest scoring records on their travels.
Contents
- 1 Why Home–Away Attacking Splits Are a Coherent Category
- 2 What the Current Numbers Show About Home-Heavy Attacks
- 3 Table: Illustrative Home vs Away Attacking Splits in the 2025–26 Bundesliga
- 4 Mechanisms Behind Strong Home Attacks and Weak Away Output
- 5 Conditional Scenarios Where the Split Becomes Extreme
- 6 UFABET, Pre-Match Reading, and Treating Home Heavy Attacks as One Variable
- 7 List: Practical Filters for Identifying Home-Strong, Away-Weak Attacks
- 8 Where the Home–Away Attacking Split Idea Can Mislead
- 9 Summary
Why Home–Away Attacking Splits Are a Coherent Category
Home advantage in the Bundesliga is measurable: across recent seasons, home teams score about 1.6–1.7 goals per game compared with roughly 1.5 for away sides, and win a larger share of matches. But more importantly, the spread is not uniform—some clubs leverage their home edge to a far greater degree than others, producing much higher goal averages in their own stadiums than on the road.
Home/away tables for 2025–26 highlight that teams like Bayern, Leipzig and Dortmund average well over 2 goals per home game while showing more modest attacking numbers away. Mid-tier clubs such as Hamburg, Hoffenheim or Freiburg also post elevated home scoring averages relative to their away records, indicating that tactical intent and comfort in familiar conditions shape how frequently they find the net.
What the Current Numbers Show About Home-Heavy Attacks
Bundesliga home tables from FootyStats list Bayern with 31 goals scored in just 8 home matches (3.88 per game) and Leipzig with 19 in 7 (2.71 per game), while Dortmund record 13 in 7 (1.86 per game). Away, those numbers drop: Bayern remain prolific but still see a lower goals-per-game figure, and teams like Dortmund and Stuttgart sit closer to or even below 1.5 away goals on average.
Further down the table, Hamburg, Hoffenheim and Freiburg each have double-digit home goals with averages around 1.8–2.1 per match, while their away totals in the same period lag clearly behind. That combination—above-average home attacking output with middling away numbers—defines the “score plenty at home but look blunt away” profile.
Table: Illustrative Home vs Away Attacking Splits in the 2025–26 Bundesliga
A simplified view of selected teams’ home and away scoring records makes the pattern clearer. Figures below are approximate mid-season numbers derived from home/away and goal-stat tables.
| Club | Home GF (MP) | Home goals/game | Away GF (MP) | Away goals/game | Attacking split summary |
| Bayern München | 31 (8) | 3.88 | ~17 (7) | ~2.43 | Elite in both, but even more explosive at home |
| RB Leipzig | 19 (7) | 2.71 | ~9 (7) | ~1.29 | Strong attackers at home, much tamer away |
| Borussia Dortmund | 13 (7) | 1.86 | ~8 (7) | ~1.14 | Solid at home, often restrained in away fixtures |
| Bayer Leverkusen | 18 (8) | 2.25 | ~10 (7) | ~1.43 | Regularly dominate at home, more controlled away |
| SC Freiburg | 14 (7) | 2.00 | ~6 (7) | ~0.86 | Sharp at home, struggle to create and finish away |
| Hamburger SV | 13 (8) | 1.63 | ~7 (7) | ~1.00 | More open and productive at home than on the road |
Exact values shift as the season evolves, but the structure is consistent: home goals per game sit clearly higher than away goals for these sides, sometimes by almost one goal per match. That gap is substantial enough to treat “home-strong, away-blunt” as a genuine analytical category rather than a narrative flourish.
Mechanisms Behind Strong Home Attacks and Weak Away Output
Different mechanisms combine to create these splits. At home, teams benefit from familiarity with pitch dimensions, crowd support and refereeing tendencies, which collectively encourage more aggressive pressing and higher average positions. Bundesliga data show that home sides typically take more shots and register higher xG than they do away, reflecting these structural advantages.
Many coaches also design game plans to be more front-foot at home—pushing full-backs higher, pressing more aggressively and accepting greater defensive risk. When the same teams travel, they frequently lower their line, reduce pressing intensity and prioritise structure over chaos, which naturally reduces both shots and xG. Teams with limited creative depth feel this change particularly sharply: without home momentum and extra attackers committed forward, their chance creation becomes predictable and easier to defend.
Conditional Scenarios Where the Split Becomes Extreme
Home/away discrepancies become most visible under certain schedule conditions. Against weaker opponents at home, high-pressing or possession-heavy sides like Leipzig or Leverkusen pin visitors deep, generate high shot counts and often score multiple goals. Away against similarly strong teams, they may see their share of territory drop, forcing them into more transitional or reactive football with fewer sustained attacks.
Mid-table and lower-table clubs show an even more exaggerated version. Freiburg or Hamburg can lean on home crowds to maintain high intensity for longer, sustaining pressing and attacking patterns that produce goals against comparable or weaker visitors. Away, especially in hostile or tactically challenging stadiums, the same sides often struggle to string together attacks, leading to extended spells of low-xG football and narrow or goalless outcomes.
UFABET, Pre-Match Reading, and Treating Home Heavy Attacks as One Variable
When reviewing fixtures on a football betting website or betting environment such as UFA168, it is tempting to treat a club’s overall goals-per-game figure as a universal description—assuming a team that “scores a lot” will do so regardless of venue. A more careful pre-match analysis splits numbers into home and away: recognising that Freiburg, Leipzig or Hamburg may justify goal-friendly expectations at home, but require a different baseline when travelling. That approach changes how you interpret totals, BTTS and even handicaps; if markets price an away game for a historically home-driven attack as though it were a neutral or home fixture, there may be room to question whether the line is leaning too heavily on overall averages and not enough on venue-specific behaviour.
List: Practical Filters for Identifying Home-Strong, Away-Weak Attacks
To turn the idea into a structured tool rather than a vague impression, a set of filters can be applied to any Bundesliga team. Each filter connects directly to expected attacking output by venue.
- Home vs away goals and xG: check whether a team’s home goals per game and xG significantly exceed their away figures—ideally by 0.5 goals or more; consistent gaps point to systematic behavioural differences.
- Shot volume and shot quality: compare home and away shots and xG per shot; sides that fire more often and from closer range at home but see those numbers drop away are classic candidates for this profile.
- Tactical intent and line height: use average-position and pressing data or match reports to see whether the team plays higher, presses more and commits more numbers forward at home than away.
- Performance versus different tiers: examine whether the home surplus persists against both weak and strong opponents, while away scoring lags even against comparable or weaker sides; that indicates a genuine venue effect, not just fixture difficulty.
When most of these filters say the same thing, “home scores a lot, away looks blunt” is not just storytelling but an accurate shorthand for how the team behaves across the season.
Where the Home–Away Attacking Split Idea Can Mislead
This concept becomes unreliable when it is anchored only on small samples, for example early in the season or over a handful of fixtures. A run of high-scoring home matches and low-scoring away games can arise simply from opponent quality, weather or random finishing streaks. As more matches are played, some of these apparent splits narrow.
It can also mislead when tactical or personnel changes occur mid-season. A team that signed a prolific striker or changed coach to a more aggressive model may rapidly undermine earlier away-blunt numbers, while injuries or fatigue can reduce home output later in the campaign. Without updating the assessment using current home/away stats and recent tactical context, a once-accurate label can lag behind reality.
Summary
Bundesliga home/away tables for 2025–26 highlight a set of teams whose attacking profiles are clearly venue-dependent: Bayern, Leipzig, Dortmund, Leverkusen and several mid-table clubs score far more often at home than away, sometimes by nearly a goal per match. The causes lie in tactical intent, crowd-driven intensity and structural differences in pressing and risk between home and road games.
By separating home and away goals, xG and shot data—and by accounting for how teams alter their approach across venues—analysts can move beyond one-size-fits-all goal expectations. That turns “home great, away blunt” from a fan cliché into a measured description of how specific Bundesliga sides actually attack in different environments.